The measurement equations of a single-dish and an interferometer are quite different from each other. Indeed, the measurement equation of a single-dish antenna is $$ I_\mathrm{meas}^\mathrm{sd} = B_\mathrm{sd} \star I_\mathrm{source} + N $$ i.e. the measured intensity ( \(I_{\mathrm{meas}}^{\mathrm{sd}}\) ) is the convolution of the source intensity distribution ( \(I_{\mathrm{source}}\) ) by the single-dish beam ( \(B_{\mathrm{sd}}\) ) plus some thermal noise, while the measurement equation of an interferometer can be rewritten as $$ I_\mathrm{meas}^\mathrm{id} = B_\mathrm{dirty} \star \left(B_\mathrm{primary}.I_\mathrm{source}\right) + N, $$ i.e. the measured intensity ( \(I_{\mathrm{meas}}^{\mathrm{id}}\) ) is the convolution of the source intensity distribution times the primary beam ( \(B_{\mathrm{primary}}.I_{\mathrm{source}}\) ) by the dirty beam ( \(B_{\mathrm{dirty}}\) ) plus some thermal noise. \(B_{\mathrm{sd}}\) has very similar properties than \(B_{\mathrm{primary}}\) and very different properties than \(B_{\mathrm{dirty}}\) . In radioastronomy, \(B_{\mathrm{sd}}\) and \(B_{\mathrm{primary}}\) both have (approximately) Gaussian shapes. Moreover, the fact that we will use the single-dish information to produce the short-spacing information filtered out by the interferometer implies that \(B_{\mathrm{sd}}\) and \(B_{\mathrm{primary}}\) have similar full width at half maximum. Now, \(B_{\mathrm{dirty}}\) is quite far from a Gaussian shape with the current generation of interferometer (in particular, it has large sidelobes) and the primary side lobe of \(B_{\mathrm{dirty}}\) has a full width at half maximum close to the interferometer resolution, i.e. much smaller than the FWHM of \(B_{\mathrm{sd}}\) .
Merging both kinds of information obtained from such different measurement equations thus asks for a dedicated processing. There are mainly two families of short-spacing processing: the hybridization and the pseudo-visibility techniques.