Once the data has been acquired by an interferometer such as the NOrthern Extended Millimter Array (NOEMA) or ALMA, two different approaches may be used for its reduction and analysis:
The choice of clearly separating calibration and imaging+deconvolution was taken at start of the Plateau de Bure Interferometer, when the limiting number of antennas prevented the use of self-calibration. While many points of the calibration algorithms inside CLIC are specific to NOEMA data (in particular its range of Signal-to-Noise ratio), the algorithms of imaging+deconvolution can be used in many different contexts and the visualization and analysis of spectra cubes is mainly independent of the instrument that delivered the data. This last point implies that users can import data from ALMA (mainly through FITS format) in IMAGER for imaging and deconvolution, and in VIEWER for visualization. But the reverse is also true. While calibration of NOEMA data should be done inside CLIC, imaging+deconvolution and visualization+analysis can be done in other softwares (e.g. MIRIAD, AIPS, CASA for the imaging and deconvolution and KARMA for the visualization and analysis).
With the improvement of NOEMA (increase of the number of antennas and better receiver sensitivities) and with the advent of a new generation of interferometer (ALMA), the additional step of self-calibration may improve the consistency of the final results by imposing additional consistent constraints on the calibration. This self-calibration step is further presented in Section9.